Figure S1 E) displayed as −log 10 ( p adj ), where p adj is the multiple-hypothesis-corrected p value from DESeq2. Notable regions are highlighted in red. Note that genes SNORD107 and SNORD64 in the schematic are intended to help orient the reader, and due to the genes’ small size, locations are approximate and not drawn to scale. (E) qPCR of SNRPN-GFP for validations of individual gRNAs of the pat SNRPN-2A-GFP CRISPRi dCas9 KRAB screen with either dCas9 KRAB or dCas9 only (no effector) to control for steric hindrance. Fold-change values normalized to NT gRNA within either dCas9 KRAB - or dCas9-only conditions. (F) qPCR of SNRPN-GFP from individual or pooled gRNA validations of selected gRNAs in the mat1 and mat2 regions. (G) Summary of the PWS gRNA sub-library. (H) qPCR of SNRPN-GFP in mat SNRPN-GFP iPSCs with Tet1c dCas9 14 days after transduction with the indicated gRNA. For qPCR in (E), (F), and (H), fold change values are plotted as mean ± SD, but statistics were calculated on ΔΔCt values (normalized to GAPDH and empty or NT vector sample); for (E), two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comprisons test vs. NT; for (F) and (G), one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s test vs. empty vector. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 relative to NT/empty vector. Unmarked comparisons are not significant. " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Cell Genomics
Article Title: Activation of the imprinted Prader-Willi syndrome locus by CRISPR-based epigenome editing
doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.100770
Figure Lengend Snippet: High-throughput screens reveal regulatory elements of maternal and paternal SNRPN alleles (A) Schematic of the PWS locus on chr15 with common PWS deletions and the PWS gRNA library. Each thin vertical line represents an sgRNA. Genes colored blue are maternally imprinted, those that are pink are paternally imprinted, and those that are gray are not imprinted. (B) Summary of the PWS gRNA library. (C) Schematic of experimental protocol for CRISPRa/CRISPRi screens. (D) CRISPR screen results (magnified, see Figure S1 E) displayed as −log 10 ( p adj ), where p adj is the multiple-hypothesis-corrected p value from DESeq2. Notable regions are highlighted in red. Note that genes SNORD107 and SNORD64 in the schematic are intended to help orient the reader, and due to the genes’ small size, locations are approximate and not drawn to scale. (E) qPCR of SNRPN-GFP for validations of individual gRNAs of the pat SNRPN-2A-GFP CRISPRi dCas9 KRAB screen with either dCas9 KRAB or dCas9 only (no effector) to control for steric hindrance. Fold-change values normalized to NT gRNA within either dCas9 KRAB - or dCas9-only conditions. (F) qPCR of SNRPN-GFP from individual or pooled gRNA validations of selected gRNAs in the mat1 and mat2 regions. (G) Summary of the PWS gRNA sub-library. (H) qPCR of SNRPN-GFP in mat SNRPN-GFP iPSCs with Tet1c dCas9 14 days after transduction with the indicated gRNA. For qPCR in (E), (F), and (H), fold change values are plotted as mean ± SD, but statistics were calculated on ΔΔCt values (normalized to GAPDH and empty or NT vector sample); for (E), two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comprisons test vs. NT; for (F) and (G), one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s test vs. empty vector. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001 relative to NT/empty vector. Unmarked comparisons are not significant.
Article Snippet: Plasmid containing Tet1c coding sequence , Addgene , #108245.
Techniques: High Throughput Screening Assay, CRISPR, Control, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation